Render! Render!

When somebody asks me, what do you work as? Perhaps in a naive way I respond: well, I do renders, infographics, 3d, you know, I use 3d max, AutoCAD, etc. for it. With friends, I assume they have understood it, but I sense in many cases, people don’t understand at all.

A render is an image obtained from computer-made models, whether they are in 3d Max, Maya, Blender, SketchUp, Cinema 4D, even Auto CAD 3d, Revit and other programs that I probably don't even know. I have experience with Autocad 3d, 3d Max, Revit and Sketch Up that I learned in Cuba at university, I suppose because it was free. I’m also curious about Rhinoceros 3D, I would love to learn it, maybe later...

In these programs what you do is model. What does this mean? It means to create from an idea, a sketch or a plan, a 3d model; usually with a scale (I love numbers). At first I started working with a fellow designer who in his case cared more about the final image than the creation of the objects themselves, oops!! We had a few problems because of that at the beginning!! I like everything with measurements; then I understood that in the end, sometimes, it isn’t too important.

But a render is not just a model. You have to put the materials, the textures, an environment and the light!!!! Très important!! Yes! The light, if it’s an interior, artificial and natural and if it’s exterior, then the sun, unless you want to do a night vision. You can use rendering engines that are getting better and simpler to use: Mental Ray (3d's own), Vray, Octane, Corona, Renderman, Fstorm, Redshift, and Arnold. I know Mental Ray, Vray and Corona. My favourite is Corona Renderer! The quality it gives and how intuitive it is makes me happy.

For me, reaching the end of an image I am creating and feeling under pressure from a client reminds me of how master painters never finished a painting until forced to so when their dealer went to their studio and told the painter that it’s done (or must be), because he needs the finished product to sell so he can eat!   

It’s a bit pretentious to compare myself to a master painter, I know, but the pressure is the same, right?
Well, I tend to never finish images, even if they’re apparently finished. There’s s more to do.
If you want something realistic, you end up using Photoshop for retouching even minimally, sometimes there are very cool images from the rendering program but in my case I always like to give it a touch up in Photoshop.
I particularly love those images that look like works of art. Just a few days ago I found a dossier with works by the Irish architects Yvonne Farrell and Shelley McNamara, winners of the 2020 Pritzker prize. Mainly there is a render of the project “London School of Economics and Political Science”, which seem to me to be incredibly sensitive, in a watercolour style with a naive touch due to the colours it uses for daily elements. In my opinion, it can be given the category of work of art as an image.

On the other hand we have those perfect images that are so real you can confuse them with a real image and in many cases that is the purpose of lots of us who work in this branch of image creation. Whatever the goal, rendering or creating a virtual image saves a lot of headaches and helps sell a product. Usually in architecture school we do not use the render only as a final image but we use 3d models and renders to help us, as another tool, to create and design as well as a volumetric or conceptual model. It helps us to explain an idea to shape it; it helps us on the way of creation and of course to show that idea as a final product.

London School of Economics and Political Science/ LaureatesYvonne Farrell and Shelley McNamara

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The art of doing NOTHING.

Reinforced concrete

Mathematics in the arts.